Iguassu Falls

Iguassu Falls

Writing Theme Music

Sunday, March 6, 2016

Role Model: Female Huntress



Remember this: You want bees-use honey. You want blowflies-use dead wild game carcass.



I told myself I would never do this again. I have been reading the Miley Cyrus rants and reviewing the current and on-going female representation in hunting via social media’s ether, by labeling certain females as role models of hunting.

I was disappointed. Was there a light somewhere in the smog of hunting that shows one female had finally diverted from the it’s all about me, hate the anti’s, and how dare you fellow hunter question me and my antics?

I removed my glasses and massaged my temples before humorously setting about finding this person. I was a little astounded by what I found-because of the one.

My thinking was: if I peruse the role model females’ pages in the mildest sense of research-there should not be a problem. That is what a role model is for-a template for someone not accustomed to what something should be to help them mimic it.

I saw the insulting quote post about looking at a page one too many times. If you wanted celebrity, then you shouldn’t have a problem having people look at it 100 times. What is up with the baiting posts?

Is that not what you wanted? Is it to the point, the page holder feels confident in mistreating anyone cruising through because the page itself represents a target for some? The page has a bait post to drag someone in for confrontation-so it is set up to catch sensitive types that have to post with knee jerk reactions.

I think of addiction-the addict gets use to a certain drug or liquor, and hits the poison of choice everyday not realizing the damage it is doing to their brain, body, and soul. Everyone around this poor soul is saying to them, this is detrimental to you-why don’t you stop? You watch them tip the bottle back, or crack open their chemistry set of narcotics to issue a dose-then off to lala-land they go; dead to the world and your warnings.

Right now, there are certain female hunting role models that do not realize the damage they are doing to themselves and anyone looking up to them. They rebuke intelligent recourse, and some of those interactions are probably negative which makes them ear-blind.

They are in a blind but they’re blind.

This is not about how the female hunting role model goes out and does her physical hunting, or her mentality when participating. It is about the behavior of a human being that disregards fellow hunters’ observations on their behavior and how it is detrimental to what they are trying to achieve. The garbled message people are comprehending and following in behind is lost to the four winds.

I had to stop looking at all this hunting squalor because it makes me feel like I am watching bad chintz wallpaper peel. It is boring too, because the articles are all the same.

If I want reality, I’ll mosey on over to Meateater. I can live with Steve and his wormy attitude.

I looked up four female hunters that are considered to some extent female role models. I went by their Facebook pages, ergo some of them had twitter accounts with the same information but varying followers.

Huntress No. 1

% Self-promotion
% Out-sourced advertising
% Politics and Political Views
% Inflammatory-Insulting posts geared toward groups not supportive     of hunting
% arguments with fellow hunters

Huntress No. 2

% Animal Rights Activist-Hunter Shenanigans
% Epic, My Life is so much more epic than yours posts
% Out-sourced posts from random pages not self-generated
% Nothing about the actual person except photos
% Inflammatory-insulting posts geared toward groups not supportive     of hunting

Huntress No. 3 (she’s been trying to get famous since she had her                   moles removed off her face)

% Self-promotion
% Inflammatory-insulting posts geared toward groups not supportive     of hunting
% allows multiple attacks on fellow hunters if they are foreign       female hunters

Huntress No. 4

% Self-promotion
% inflammatory-insulting posts geared toward groups not supportive     of hunting
% Promoting hunting for women, children, and education

*Finally learned the power of good Public Relations and filtering the crap from the cream. Guess who this No. 4 is?

I wonder. Why it is important to entertain a conversation when it is based around negative rhetoric?

I won’t lie. Some of these women make me want to gag-gagging the rainbow.

I see posts saying, “Do your research, learn about wildlife conservation…”, but you do not see the research being displayed on these women’s pages.

You want that information; you have to read Ecology, National Wildlife, Wildlife Conservation Magazine, State wildlife Magazines, or Ranger Rick.

I digress; I don’t have to bash any of these females. That door was opened by them the moment they took to social media, and the world started throwing punches and shooting fire arrows at them.

No. 4 was Melissa Bachman. I perused her Facebook page and actually like it, when before I didn’t. It is more professional and the negativity has been drained from it. It was good to see at least one problemed female taking her public relations and image seriously, while putting the focal point on her abilities, performance and outreach instead of being the visual victim of attacks with pomp and circumstance through self-generated altercations.

Some hunters want to articulate to these top-notch celebrity figures that the behavior and the actions are causing the problem-but fear being excluded and branded a hunting heretic.

Does anyone remember the election? I didn't get the memo to vote, did you?

I would not have voted any of these people as role models, celebrities, or even representatives of the Hunting sport. It is shameful to say the least, and that is the women-some of the men are just as bad.

If you want to do Hunting a favor, hunters need to stand up to this kind of behavior. Hunters need to let these hunters,voted by unknown sources as the representation of the hunting sport, be informed by the masses that what is being publicly advertised and displayed as examples of hunting participants is not consistently true of the vast number of diverse hunters. It is direly erroneous.  

It is a misrepresentation of the diversity and quality of hunters everywhere.

I want to know when this crap is going to stop being a thing.

~Courtesy of the AOFH~

Copyright © 2026 All Rights Reserved.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Open Letter to President Obama




Remember this: No one was ever hurt by a birthday wish; especially a wish that would be meaningful to a lot of viewers.

Dear Mr. President Obama,

Tonight, I was watching one of the few shows I slot time for to give my full attention to the commentary and content, that show is Real Time with Bill Maher.

It would seem with Mr. Maher’s sixtieth birthday that his request would be to have you, President Obama, on his show, Real Time with Bill Maher. I call that a goal- a viable and good for public relations goal, especially on your part.

Mr. Maher has said nothing but good things on your part, given the truthful and thoughtful commentary Mr. Maher has been known to provide to his following.

I am sure Mr. Maher’s agenda is true to the show based around political issues. I would like to see what this commentary would be about given the political climate of your servitude as President.

This would be good for President Public Relations, a well-deserved political capstone for the both of you-given your good works, and answer to my question: Who wouldn’t want to have Real Time with Bill Maher on their life’s resume?

Mr. Bill Maher endorses the concept of critical thinking, observation, education, reading and knowledge, and above all else-truthful, meaningful thought on issues that matter and should be pushed to the forefront of the viewers’ agenda; content that is substantial and important to your life.

Mr. Maher’s content is meaningful and relevant for the time-such as climate change, political analysis of politicians going into the election to make better voting choices, immigrant issues, and so forth.

I think this would be a great fit for you, Mr. President and Mr. Bill Maher.

Is there some way time can be worked out to fulfill this birthday request? People have been invited to the White House all the time, and you are going to shows-Can you make this happen?

If so, don’t delay, please contact Mr. Bill Maher’s people and get this potential episode on the show role.

I am sure I am not the only one desiring to see this. Be all you can be I say. I stand with Mr. Bill Maher on this most excellent idea.It's definitely a win-win situation.

I just want to watch an hour's worth of Awesome.

Sign the Petition if you to want to see this interview on Real Time with Bill Maher: http://itsh.bo/Barack4BillsBirthday


~Courtesy of the AOFH~

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

The Relevance of The Revenant































Remember this:  Coincidence, I think not.

Zoom In: [Dramatic Spanish Soap Opera Eye]

Sleep was eluding me. The Golden Globes made the final wrap up. I turned off the television. While lying in my bed, I was watching select versions of DiCaprio’s body of work projecting through my mental reel. I picked up my cell phone to scroll through images of movies past. There was a strange thing appearing among them. I felt compelled to write this.

Disclaimer: Anything written here is me, writing. Do not get your panties in a bunch. I am not going to wear a diaper, drive miles out of my way to camp out at some celebs house just to be incarcerated with a mug shot on Bad Hair Day. No thank you.

Besides someone else is writing the content of the script and the director is guiding the movie-the actor is the character made manifest driving the storyline.

I could be writing a bunch of malarkey. Enjoy!

[Somewhere in the head of Angelia, she hears Gonzo’s voice proclaim profusely, “We Must Flee!”]

DiCaprio’s theme is a significant female other that goes through a process of evolution as the singular made plural. There is no mistaking the feminine lurking in the lines between the script pages of films he chooses to operate from.

I became aware of this because of a scene in The Revenant. It is the Feminine Apparition that haunts him. It is the thing that he contemplates on but really doesn’t know except for his reality based relationship with his mother. This is the one relationship he can actually put his hands on and be secure in it not swaying left or right of what it actually is.

Who would not want that? Unconditional, undying love-always.

Moving that kind of love onto a non-blood relative is hard sometimes. For others, it is as effortless as breathing.

The theme of the female apparition is no longer alive, questionably real being made of substance, but living in the spirit world while eliciting an effect on a living counterpart; for good or bad.

Is this true of everyone? We feel we have this thing haunting us. We can’t quite put our finger on whatever it is. We question our reality, argue at the concept hoping to diffuse its mystery choking us down with synchronicities and coincidences; yet ever elusive.

We rage at the mystery, it holds us hostage, then we fall into a babbling heap of defeat at being unable to overcome and discover what the mystery is. Jump back up, shake our fists at the sky, say, “never again”, and fall back into a miserable, resentful pulp on the floor; suckered yet again.

Much like a ghostly deer; real, not real, questionable yet firm in its answer but always under the suspicion of: How concrete a thing is the idea, person, place, or thing?

I, relative stranger, may not be real…

Oh, to be a stone!

For those wanting to watch The Revenant: I don’t plan on doing spoilers. My opinion of the movie was a beautiful, emotional journey in need of cosmic closure driven by a series of events.

I was elated with whoever made the decision for utilizing the landscape and backdrop, got the same sense I do when I am outdoors. When you are outdoors at certain times you know and experience what your senses and your eyes see; motion, sound and light.

Of course, one cannot smell a movie.

The silent noise with perspective instances where light gives the viewer the sense of that otherworldliness desensitized in busy, distracted people. If you have ever been in a pine tree with the wind blowing during the fall and the sounds of nature around you-you will instantly understand. Think of the song (versions differ):

Rock a bye babe,
In the tree tops
When the wind blows
The cradle will rock

Have you not heard this song before?

The swaying of pines trees is comforting-at least to me. The swaying of any tree is comforting be it weeping willow and mighty oak.

If not, learn to make friends or find a place to get that experience. You will not regret it. God bless that lighting person for getting “it” and getting “it” right.

There is a scene in the movie where light comes through snow and pine needles. This seems like a mundane, time-wasting moment to tell you to go seek given sweeping vistas but sometimes the greatest epiphanies come from looking at miniscule things-you just have to be mentally willing to receive the visual.

I was enamored by watching insects, like dust balls, in tall grassy weeds during the setting sun because you don’t see the insect but its glow. You will not see it unless you lay in the grass at the right moment.

I notice meticulous care in rendering something as it is with the senses vibrating outward-even if it is from a sprig of grass on the road holding a drop of dew. Some people are aware of that kind of experience and detail. It is not just looking at flat gray paint on a wall-which does have its own set of pores.

Moving your awareness to new positive plateaus should be on your Goals Lists for Today.

There was even attention to the subtleness of sound. Silence is loud, and the introduction of animal and elemental sounds in ample proportion is a truth-given the place and time.

For the actors, coming to the understanding the places they traveled to are beautiful but trying to kill you at the same time was appreciated.

Given the broad base of DiCaprio’s work, most of his films are accentuated by the appearance of a person to which his character has a deep emotional bond, even if that bond ends in a disastrous result. The majority of the work indicates a female and has eventually moved to include the child.

Let us examine certain bodies of his work:

The Great Gatsby: Lost Love, Love Found, Wishy-Washy Lover Gets Lover Murdered.

Romeo and Juliet: Forbidden Love. Mutual suicide ensues.

DiCaprio’s character goes through the first stage of initial romantic love that eventuates in the death of both characters. The relationship ends in a suicide-suicide plot.

Can you imagine a romantic pondering the imprudence of taking your life with another because you were in the depths of obsession’s embrace based on a short-term, fleeting romantic timeline?

Anyone in their right mind would have their self-preservation kick in. “Save thyself”, Shakespeare did not quote!

Shutter Island: Reciprocal grief-driven murder-murder plot; the ultimate betray of love; filicide.

Is this a potential outcome of people getting married, one or both having mental disorders, and having kids?

Inception: Distorted reality robs lovers by lovers’ hands, ends in suicide and betrayal.

The female aspect in this movie is a hostile force. Mal, the female character becomes assimilated to the non-reality of the constructed dreams. When she returns to reality due to the continuation of the delusion of non-reality, she commits suicide and treachery at framing her male counterpart.

I was a little confused here because I wasn’t sure if the Mal character was initialing the suicide of DiCaprio’s character or his eventual awakening to reality. Here you have delusion-suicide-treacherous betrayal. This speaks to individuals in relationships being in different places due to psychology, or dysfunction of psychology.

Nothing says partner-torture like committing to a person who starts out problem-free then falls into addictive and delusional behaviors. They will drag you down with them, or one partner trying to save the other even to defeat.

At times, DiCaprio may be choosing to do these roles for an unconscious reason known only to him. One can’t exclude the reality it may be nothing more than a good script coming his way.

Who cares? Let’s run with it.  

In some ways, these roles are probably therapeutic and self-defeating at the same time to his person. Moving along to a commitment of some sort with another person is being haunted by his body of work with all its dysfunctional female characters that puts the fear of God in a person.

It’s cinematic birth control and relationship flame retardation. Genius, or not?

DiCaprio lives vicariously through the lives of his characters; never being in a functioning relationship with a female counterpart; the female counterpart is elusive and just across the line of his character realizing just how much he doesn’t know about the person he is attached to.  

Who hasn’t arrived at the old doorstep of, “Who the (F-bomb) are you? Really?” Always accentuate the profanity I say.

Fade in: [Dramatic Spanish Soap Opera Eye]
Note to operations: The Oompa Loompa stunt doubles are orange and crazy drunk.  
Action!

I acquiesce to Basic Instinct, Fear, and Fatal Attraction for the I Ching on crazy people in relationships.

Can one imagine what effect this would have as a form of re-enforcement against forming mutual, loving bonds with other people?

It wouldn’t be far-fetched to assume, yet we shouldn’t assume, that there is always a residual of the role actors play in life, and how that role can murky up the waters of reality for the person playing the part.


Always, there is the female apparition that DiCaprio cannot hold on to due to life’s impermanence but his characters try to the detriment of emotional well-being and heartbreaking disappointment.

In Inception, Mal thought her suicide was a part of a dream then slips off a ledge. In Shutter Island, Dolores goes up in a cloud of ash in a dream sequence. In Romeo and Juliette, Juliette commits suicide. In The Revenant, Hugh Glass’s Pawnee wife dies, but she haunts him throughout his trials to warn him on to the final scenes. This character is the only one not noted as instable because she dies early. We know she is Pawnee, has a child with Glass, and somehow walks through the spirit world to encourage or lead Glass from harm. In The Great Gatsby, Daisy Buchanan leads Gatsby to his murder because of her wishy-washy ways. All Gatsby wants to do is love her and it isn’t enough.

This final female apparition is the one that is the most mysterious. The stable, motherly-wife figure, minus the dramatic dysfunction, that can be counted on to help guide or stay with him throughout the rest of his journey to whatever end it becomes.

As I was writing this, I had this mental image of DiCaprio on the side of a creek. He is walking in shallow pools in a creek, oblivious of my presence on the bank. I am amused at him because he is turning over stones of varying sizes. Quite calm, he goes about the business of the search. For what I do not know, but I am amuse. He is just afraid to cross over. He needs to cross over because something more rewarding in his personal life could be waiting on the other side. He’s already proved his professional life.

DiCaprio’s work says almost, “I am afraid. These things can end painfully disastrous. It is better to be haunted, but single.”

When you compare DiCaprio with Keanu Reeves, Reeves theme is the “man of burdening misfortunes” in his more serious work. He’s a different basket of fish, that one.

If fear is wearing the psychological clothes of an imaginary character, how debilitating can that be when living a life out-of-character?

I thought about it. My psyche was a little burdened by the idea the only good woman was the mysterious Pawnee wife of Hugh Glass in these roles. The rest were psycho-cats.

Fade out: [Rolling of the eyes with body contortions. Oh Gad!]

Each male character was lead to his doom by his female counterpart due to the emotional bond formed. Love will lead the way. The footnote happens to be: till death or crazy do we part.
Charon is waiting for his gold coins as these male characters take the scenic ride down the river Styx. Women are driving the boat in disguise.

How awful! To have mistrust conditioned into your psyche centering on a job. Work can condition you to do some fairly odd things if you absorb the tenants.

I almost spewed my green tea from the thought of it. Hilarious!

Then you have DiCaprio as Hugh Glass-single parent with bi-ethnic child living in an era when the child is always a target for harm.

He is now moving on to the child portion; children that he does not know.

I took a pause into my inquiry of other people’s business.

If you read DiCaprio’s movies as if you were glancing into his brain or psyche, he has now accepted the loss of the female counterpart and places all that love on a child counterpart.
The outer child could be the inner child.

How does an adult man cope if he feels he is about to lose his mother? The one person he could always count on.

Eventually, reality will drag you kicking and screaming back at the most inopportune time.

Now ask yourself, if you were an actor going through subsequent versions of the themes of love, commitment, and relationships by-products and products, if you were sitting at the poker table being dealt the cards of potential outcomes, which scenario would you be afraid of being handed, especially if the outcomes are driven by death, betrayal, grief, and unhappy endings?

What is man but to overcome his fear?

Maybe this is why; everyone should have a happy ending once in a while. Just to believe. Because, you have to believe the best possible outcome is achievable.

Lastly, the theme of love being so strong, no matter what is surrounding it, negative or positive, to surpass death itself; eventually, you have to give up the ghost-or manifest it in the physical.



~Courtesy of the AOFH~

Thursday, December 31, 2015

Why Didn't You Call Me?


Remember this: No one would answer.

I don’t care about people hunting. It is the shooting from a truck that bothers me.

As posted yesterday about the nut shooting from the truck window. I called the local DNR office to see if I could report the problem; the line rung on and on with no automated system with voice mail, or direct calls to an after-hours report line.

I decided to call this morning because those people will be out hunting today and probably the 1st.

I leave a message at the local DNR office. Officer calls me back. I begin to tell him about this person shooting from a truck. He asks me why I didn’t call him yesterday. I told him I called the office-no one answered. He tells me he was in my area up to 7 pm. I replied how was I supposed to know that? I figured if the person was desperate enough to shoot yesterday, given there was only two more days to the season-they would be out shooting tomorrow. Besides, they already realized they were seen and decided to leave.

I told him that every time I call the after-hours number the person there replies like battery acid and that I didn’t have good experiences with the DNR people on duty.

This is the modus operandi of DNR employees in dealing with caller complaint.

The officer does not take down the complaint and listen to you.
The officer becomes argumentative about why you are calling.
The officer whines there isn't enough help to cover the complaints.
You are suppose to magically know daily schedule of the DNR officer so as not to impose inconvenience on him.
The officer will defend the criminal because it is two days left to the season and why bother? Right? 

   I finally became frustrated and told the officer he wasn’t interested in listening to my complaint. All the officer had to do was pencil my complaint down and tell me he would look into it. This is not what they do. It becomes a reverse argument based on implied lack of response on the part of the caller by the DNR investigator.

The truth seems to be: They just don't want to be bothered.

Somehow, you are the guilty party. I replied that I felt he was defending the person breaking the law. He was trying to reason with me why he shouldn’t bother to look into this person. It was more important to disregard my complaint, upset me and I was already bothered by the shooter from the truck window. It is not my problem the DNR doesn’t employ enough staff to do the work.

I thought about calling the main office in the upstate, but if this officer’s attitude is a reflection of the overall attitude of the state DNR employees-it is a waste of time and effort.

When you have to use the current behavior of a DNR officer as the prime example for why you weren't Johnny-On-the-Spot for calling, is a sad indicator of the treatment a caller complaint is going to receive when calling that agency regardless of the content of the complaint.

Some of the money coming out of your pocket is probably paying that employee for extending to you a poor example of bad customer service. 

But you better be respectful of them at all times even when they are disrespecting of  you? How is that right?

What good is a state agency when the workers refuse to do their job? How safe are you actually as a private land owner when someone agitates your property boundaries out of hunting desperation?



~Courtesy of the AOFH~

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Vehicle Hunters: Dogs, Guns, and Blatant Disregard



Remember this: This ain’t the O-K Corral.

I have a current, active hunting and fishing license. I’ve been several times since my escape from that land: the Southwest.
For the past two years, the last couple of days of hunting season bring out the worst desperation for hunters. Every year it gets worse.
I am not sure what drives this need to do desperate acts. Is the stress and pressure to keep up, produce a product, and suck up to everyone to stay in the nook of their good graces that much of a problem in the hunting world? Is it worth it and for how long?  
I was having a tire plugged and doing some farrier work on my pony. The other horses alerted me that something was amiss out by the road. I looked up and saw a dark blue, Chevrolet truck parked in the road at the edge of the other pasture. This pasture extends out to the woods and my horses ramble around wherever they please eating.
I thought, “How creepy. Not sure if that is someone casing the joint, or just being a douche.”
I turned my head to grab the part to put air in my tires when I heard a loud shotgun go off. I jerked and looked straight at the vehicle. Three more were popped off. I said some profanities.
Every horse person in the known universe can concur: You do not mess with my horses.
This person was sitting in their truck shooting out over the pasture from the window. The truck was parked a stone’s throw from the neighbor’s residence. The wife is always in the house but hardly ever comes out.
I wasn’t sure what they could be shooting at. The woods were two pastures away. I couldn’t remember if it were dove hunting season-but still-no one is supposed to shoot from a vehicle especially out over someone else’s private property.
It agitated my father, who sent me after another truck while he watched the dark blue Chevrolet now backing up to hide behind the neighbor’s magnolia tree. Someone has been trespassing on his property and menacing him while he hunts. He can’t hunt in peace because of the boundary agitation by out-of-community hunters and community hunters skulking about in vehicles.
Now the private land owner that hunts is being assaulted by the vehicular hunter, who acts pretty much like a scavenger predator (coyote) at the boundaries.
I don’t think anyone foresaw this problem with landless hunters not willing to hunt sparse public land then converging on the areas outside of private land owners while trying to circumvent the land owner’s request for hunt lease funds in lieu of access; then trying to figure out how to run wildlife off of rest areas or quiet hunt areas in private lands by using trespassing hunting dogs, gun fire from mobile vehicles, and trespassing by driving onto ungated private land as a get-in and get-out scenario.
Just because you have a hunting license doesn’t give anyone the right to expect a property owner to hand over access to their property and open the property owner up to liability because of someone’s potentially hazardous pastime.
I left and followed another one barreling down the road. You find out one hunter-he or she knows who the others are because they are literally sucking at pack hunting. Low and behold, he was crawling under the neighbor’s cattle gate to grab a hunting dog.
The problem with hunting dogs with this scenario is putting them out on the boundary of a private area you have no access to, then know those dogs are going to cross over that inaccessible land without permission of the land owner in hopes of driving animals off-this is probably done while another hunter is in a stand trying to hunt that area with a valid hunting lease.
It is blatant disregard; much like someone shooting out over my horse pasture.
I thought of some suggestions. People like the option of suggestion.
If hunters are going to be allowed to hunt with dogs, those dogs should be microchipped, wearing identification collars, or collared with tracking systems. If a private landowner should find one on their land, should be able to require a payment of a return fee to have that dog relinquished back to the owner-payable by the owner to the landowner. Also, there should be accountability on the part of the hunter using the hunting dog. That dog’s identifier should be register with the DNR for monitoring for a fee that way if the hunter is unwilling to pay the return fee on the dog-they should be fined for negligible abandonment. This would reaffirm accountability when the dog walks out in front of someone’s vehicle and causes that person’s property to be damaged and in need of repair.
Now, this business of shooting from a vehicle can cause all kinds of problems. You never know when you are pointing a weapon at someone’s property, even if you think it is the woods, that there might be someone standing right there or walking by that could catch the spray of it. It is also wrong to open fire around residential areas far from the woods, even if you’re shooting at birds out of bird hunting season. Home owners don’t want to be menaced by out-of-community vehicular hunters blasting away for unknown reasons and scaring people.  This is a good way to get shot at by senile, older people who take offense at unwanted gun play from hooligans.
This has become an embarrassing and shameful way to be. Deer feed people, even undeserving, selfish people. Yet, the very animals everyone claims as “only for food” are treated like corn fodder, nothing more than an object, not deserving of any kind of respect.
Hunters are state constituents with a purchased privilege to do an activity. They are not God, nor are hunters entitled to walk around like John Poppy Cock demanding non-hunting participants smooch posterior because of implied and expected erroneous, cognitive delusions of being an alpha hunter; one that uses everything under the sun to catch a sad little deer.
There possibly is plenty of deer in the upstate. Several years now, my observation is the steady lack of visuals on deer. In order for me to even hear a buck, I have to listen in the dark after 10 pm. Not only the animal but the human is menaced by the ever imposing presence of vigilant hunters waiting to score.  
I would hate the idea that people are so hunter-greedy someone wants to make deer hunting a nighttime sport-because I am a hunter, I don’t apologize- blah, blah, blah.
Everything is eventual, per Stephen King, at the rate hunting is traveling it will reach its carrying capacity before it makes a free dive.
I ponder that hunters lost sight of how to be. Hunting appears to be an ever-growing soulless dead thing that no longer knows how to be-at least from my vantage point.
Is this the irony of hunting? To be a soul-less dead thing much like the multitude of soul-less dead things that is the eventual outcome of its labors.

~Courtesy of the AOFH~