Remember this: The thing that a lot of people cannot comprehend is that Mother Nature doesn't have a bullet with your name on it, she has millions of bullets inscribed with "to whom it may concern.
~Anonymous Sage~
Thank the Great Unknown, all the scientists, geeks, and nerds for our technology. As hunters, we rely on the meteorologists of the world, cell phone apps, and gadgetry to tell us when it will forecast rain, blazing sun, icy snow, sun rise/set, and when the tides are high or low. At times, we use the old finger-lick technique to see which way the wind is blowing. I guess you could fart and see if you could smell it by the wind coming up from behind.
There are certain initial weather conditions that we can determine beforehand and the secondary fallout from such blights of natural disaster via meteorologic information. In some cases, tornadoes, twisters, tsunamis, etc. just seem to appear out of nowhere with little warning. There are also long burning forest fires from lightning and dry conditions, snow storms, flooding, disease pandemics, and other surprises on the horizon. Nature's good graces and wrath are upon the landscape of Earth in varying degrees.
Rain was pelting my window, slowly lulling me to sleep as I watched television. The reason for this foray into Nature's weather was based from a boot commercial running in between hunting shows. It wasn't a boot issue for sure. The commentator stated something to the effect, “...Man will be Nature's equal”. I heard the sour sound of a bad string being plucked on my inner banjo. Not wanting to be nit-picky, I cleared my mind to focus on the question: how could this partial statement be interpreted?
As
Hurricane Arthur breezed its way passed, people breathed a sigh of
relief. I thought about the relationship between hunting participants
and Nature, as it stands from a human perspective. Hurricanes
definitely can serve up a terrible dose of Mother Nature's wrath if
you've never experienced one. Unprecedented damage to life and limb,
displacement of families and animals, rebuilding and problem-solving
for communities for years to come. If you have long endured such a
beast during your lifetime, you learn what to do and not to do. The
most you can do if you are a local is: ride it out like a big kahuna
wave and hope you don't crash under the wave itself.
What
could be the possible human perspectives of living as a part or
separate from Nature? The human perspective is: you live with Nature
as a functioning contributor, live outside/inside of Nature as the
competitor, or live life as the spectator who just exists. There are probably otherways not mentioned.
These
ideas on the approach of the hunting participant's role in Nature is
a pie chart. A little of this and a little of that. These divisible
parts show a trend to temporarily visit as a lifestyle choice instead
of a way of living as a mutually benefiting organism. The wordage of
lifestyle choice makes it sound just that; a choice which can be
picked up or thrown down at will depending on your fancy. A portion
of hunting participants do consider Nature to be the enemy that one
must overcome and vex to feel like a hunter/adventurer. I scratch my
head at this. Yet there are hunting participants that want to be a
part of the hunting act, involving their need for the intimacy of
nature and not its conqueror. There are hunting participants who are
integral parts of the maintenance and upkeep of Nature. The list of
differing roles goes on. People exist that do not hunt but act the
same way. You don't have to look to far; oil spills, deforestation,
and displacement of indigenous peoples to assimilate into the
civilized world.
The
concept idea for marketing this boot lead me into my next critique of
how true this statement is. Can Man every truly be equal to Nature?
Is there anything right or wrong about this endeavor? Why do
divisions of humanity strive to conquer all in a sundry?
There
is also the view that Nature is the enemy and fractions of hunting
participants exists outside of Nature instead of being a crucial part
of the narrative. This seemed to be the idea the commercial was
selling. A canine with blue eyes that I observed was to
represent a wolf or agent of Nature. Was I to believe that to kill a
wolf was to conquer Nature? Maybe it should have been a double
twister with the hunter running for his life. He'd be running in the
boots. It is truly proven that this animal type, the wolf, can be
hunted and killed. There is also the suggestion to employ dogs to
hunt wolves. I wondered why hunting as is, was not good enough.
Whoever participates in this hunting activity might better think of spay or neutering their dogs.
Once in estrus, they are going to be mongrels bred up in them there
hills. Dogs will tie up through a kennel fence, as I have seen this.
Nothing to stop them out in the bushes chasing after their own kind.
On a funnier note, I once saw a chihuahua breeding a female
rottweiler who laid down on the ground for him. Naughty. Naughty. That is a hard urge to ignore.
I
figure to help with the economy, if someone is going to do a hunt
with dogs on wolves, it should be monitored by the DNR through
listing the dogs used. The dogs used should then be taken to a
veterinary with a 24-48 hour period to be checked for excessive
wounds and treatment with follow-up care. This paperwork should be
submitted by the veterinary; not the hunter. Ethically, if you're
going to endanger your hunting dog, you should not toss the dog
in the pen after they do the work. Bite puncture wounds do get
infected and turn into abscesses. These hunting dogs should also be
pre-monitored by the DNR through submitted paperwork by the hunter
listing all vaccinations, neuter, spaying and deworming. The DNR
should also charge an extra fee for the administration of this
function to ensure hunter ethics, hound health, and wolf hunting
regulations. Pen it down as going to conservation and Angelia's
love/hate relationship with veterinary medicine. Now write the check.
Humanity's
relationship with Nature in the past was, man survives Nature's wrath.
Things have not changed, except we can make it rain by dumping
particles in the clouds with planes. Covert operations could possibly bring about an earthquake, plague through biological warfare, and let
us not forget the secret death ray in outer space (tips hat to
conspiracy theorists). I forgot the Aliens. These are man-made versions of Mother Nature's
wrath by our own hand.
There
are probably times when hunters go into the mountains or the woods to
hunt only to find the weather is shifting
moods. Clear now. Foggy later. You could start out sunny and dry then end up wet, naked,
cold, and afraid. Add the unseen in the dark, staring at you like a
piece of bacon then you're in for a treat. Going into unknown terrain would dictate that the guide be knowledgeable of the changing weather patterns, how it will affect the hunt, and the possibilities of waylaying the goal of procuring the animal. I am sure there is not one client that feels uneasy when stuck out in bad weather while wondering if they are going to get trapped out in the bush.
We
could even observe commercial fishermen out on the ocean. Introduce a bad storm or some other atmospheric anomalie and you're Mark Walhberg's character in The Perfect Storm, drifting to your death in monster waves. Commercial fishermen experience this all the time when the ship topples over, gets stuck in an ice bank, the waves could push the workers over board, or strand them
out to sea. There are just things you don't see coming.
My
survey of life infernal on the planet is: a good portion of its
inhabitants are actually working on ways to co-exist with nature
instead of against or to conquer Nature. This exertion of energy
would be more beneficial to all inhabitants. Why has this taken so
long?
People
don't want to die. The impending threat of extinction on humanity's
part is enough to scare people to action and clean up their act. When
the Grim Reaper is reporting for duty, people will pray for a miracle,
sell their soul, sacrifice chickens, or check-out emotionally. Others
will dance in the street having a party. I guess if you have to die; die happy.
I
penned this commercial down as a poorly worded advertising slogan. There are people
that do have the mentality Nature is a thing to overcome.
Participants in Nature's cycles, who have this relationship with
Nature as the enemy to be conquered, are arrogant.
I will interject that I disclude adventurers who have goals to do things like climb Mt. Everest. These goals do not intel changing the world but changing or manifesting some need inside. There is little carbon foot print on the Earth or the taking of life; unless they lose their own during the expedition.The implication is not to overcome Nature but issues that block them from finishing goals from within.
I will interject that I disclude adventurers who have goals to do things like climb Mt. Everest. These goals do not intel changing the world but changing or manifesting some need inside. There is little carbon foot print on the Earth or the taking of life; unless they lose their own during the expedition.The implication is not to overcome Nature but issues that block them from finishing goals from within.
Humanity's
unchecked fingers produce products and services with poor minds sets
that bring about global dysfunction. It breeds pollution on the
landscape of Nature and we have debilitated the functioning of the
Earth to some degree. There are global changes that humanity will not
have control over. We must be accountable for trespasses and find
solutions to clean up our leftover, messy wake.
Nature
reminds us how strong and fragile we are. There is no need to conquer
the wilderness. As hunting participants, we need the landscape to
exercise our technical and spiritual skills. These skills carry one
through life. Propagate that. There is no conquering Nature or being its equal. To do
so could possibly cause a dynamic shift in our perception of the
wilderness as a thing to trample under foot instead of protect. People say we have conquered space. The universe is big and we have conquered nothing because we barely understand or know where the boundaries are.
Participants
in this life can be stewards of Earth and its creatures. We can learn
to manage components of the ecosystems to the benefit of
inhabitants. Utilizing sustainability to continue cycles and
propagate life is a better endeavor than conquering it.
Participants
that strive to be God-like by manipulating the course of
life, as it is, should be weary of the outcome. Usually we perceive a
goal but the different outcomes could be beneficial or tragic. We
can't control everything. Just as Jeff Goldblum's character stated in
Jurassic Park, “Life will find a way.”
Man
will be equal to Nature doesn't seem so relevant. Once humanity is
done there will be nothing but a bare, raped landscape filled with
deserts, death, and void of its animals. There again, shifting ideology and behavior is going toward the improvement of the environment. Where does one stand in the
throws of Nature's wrath? Where ever it is, it had better be humbled.
I subscribe more to Cody Lundin's stance of keeping my ass alive;
socks or not. All you can do in the end is survive it.
Written by: W Harley Bloodworth
~Courtesy
of the AOFH~